home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1991 / 91_1523 / 1523r035.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  71KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | poster | reckoner | sky
OCR: held liable by a court) under governing state standards much less initiate the state approval process. It is also contrary TO the state regulation, which allows for state appruval only when the local educational agency itself seeks to place the child n private school. See S. Code Regs 3(E) Furthermore approval witl be grantexl only "[w]hen IL not feasible T accord eduational t handicapped children public school Petitioner and other similariy situated local edxational agencies would not he likely make asserion This case arnply dernonstrates how requiring 101d state approval uf privalc school placements allows states to circumvent the Burtington remedy refusing approve the private school. Petitioner s adopted. South Carolina whose failure fulfill its IDEA obligation. 20 U.S. 1412 1414. tc en ...